The chart may be scrutinized for reliability due to the following reasons:
1) The United States is not listed for comparison: The absence of the United States, a major global economy, raises questions about the completeness and accuracy of the data. It might indicate a lack of comprehensive data collection or an intentional omission, making the chart incomplete and potentially unreliable.
2) India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate: If the chart underestimates India's economic development compared to its actual status, it suggests that the data might not reflect the true state of the economy. This inconsistency can decrease the reliability of the chart.
3) North Korea's high literacy rate but low GDP per capita: This discrepancy between the literacy rate and the GDP per capita in North Korea could raise doubts about the accuracy of the data. It might indicate either a misrepresentation of the literacy rate or an indication that other socio-economic factors are not properly accounted for in the chart.
4) The claim that Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan due to their literacy rates: This statement suggests a potential misunderstanding of the relationship between literacy rates and GDP per capita. It implies that the chart's creator may have flawed reasoning, leading to potential inaccuracies or biases in their interpretation of the data. This reasoning weakens the reliability of the chart.
Why would the information on this chart be scrutinized for reliability?
(1 point)
Responses
The United States is not listed for comparison.
The United States is not listed for comparison.
India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.
India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.
North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low.
North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low.
Because of their Literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per Capita than Taiwan
1 answer