The third option, "The nucleus is very large compared to the rest of the atom, just like the balloon surrounding the magnet," is the closest reason to why placing two very strong magnets in the middle of two separate balloons would provide a good model for nuclear fusion.
In nuclear fusion, two atomic nuclei come close enough to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between them and join together to form a larger nucleus. In this model, the magnets represent the atomic nuclei and the balloons represent the electrostatic force that keeps them apart.
However, the other options provided do not accurately represent the process of nuclear fusion. The positive charges of the nuclei do not make it difficult for them to join, as fusion occurs by overcoming the repulsive forces. Some nuclei do repel each other, but some also attract each other, and this attraction plays a role in fusion. Lastly, nuclear fusion does not lead to the destruction of atoms, as it results in the formation of a larger nucleus with a release of energy.
Why would placing two very strong magnets in the middle of two separate balloons provide a good model for nuclear fusion?
• The positive charges of the nuclei make it difficult for the nuclei to join, just like the balloons keep the magnets apart
• Some nuclei repel each other and some attract each other, just like two sides of a magnet
• The nucleus is very large compared to the rest of the atom, just like the balloon surrounding the magnet
• If the atoms combined, then it would destroy both of them, just like the balloons would be destroyed
1 answer