Why would it not be appropriate for a Congress to get the Supreme Court opinion about a bill? It is considering would it be because it would check the presidents power of veto it would upset the legislative process. The Supreme Court cannot rule on the law that does not exist, or the Supreme Court is not in session when Congress is in session

1 answer

It would not be appropriate for Congress to seek the Supreme Court's opinion on a bill it is considering because it would be an improper mixing of powers between the legislative and judicial branches of government. The Supreme Court's role is to interpret and apply existing laws, not to provide advisory opinions on potential legislation. Seeking the Court's opinion on a bill could undermine the separation of powers and interfere with the legislative process. Additionally, the Supreme Court cannot rule on a law that does not yet exist, as it can only provide rulings on actual cases and controversies. Additionally, the Supreme Court may not be in session when Congress is considering a bill, further complicating the logistical feasibility of seeking its opinion.