A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities. This type of map uses symbols (often circles) that vary in size to represent the magnitude or quantity of a particular phenomenon at different locations, allowing for a clear visual representation of differences in data values across the map.
Why would a geographer decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map?(1 point) Responses A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quantitative data in the form of percentages A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quantitative data in the form of percentages A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances. A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances. A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.
1 answer