A geographer might decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map for several reasons:
1. Emphasizing magnitude: A proportional symbol map allows the geographer to size the symbols based on the variable being represented, such as population or economic indicators. This allows for a clearer visual representation of the relative magnitudes of different locations or regions.
2. Simplicity and clarity: Proportional symbol maps tend to be simpler and easier to interpret compared to dot density maps. Each symbol on a proportional symbol map represents a specific value or range, while dot density maps can become visually crowded and complex, especially when representing high-density areas.
3. Visual impact: Proportional symbol maps can have a stronger visual impact and be more engaging for viewers. Uneven distribution and varying sizes of symbols can catch the attention and effectively convey the patterns and variations in data.
4. Data availability: Proportional symbol maps can be used when the available data does not lend itself well to a dot density map. For example, if the data is provided only in aggregate values or if detailed point-level data is not available, a proportional symbol map can be a suitable alternative.
These factors influence a geographer's decision to use a proportional symbol map, based on specific requirements, objectives, and characteristics of the data being presented.
Why would a geographer decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map? (1 point)
1 answer