The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the U.S. Constitution primarily because they created a weak federal government that struggled to address the needs of the nation. Here's how the statements relate to this issue:
-
The Articles of Confederation did not give strong power to the federal government. - This is one of the core reasons for the replacement. The federal government under the Articles lacked the authority to enforce laws, collect taxes, and regulate commerce effectively, leading to economic instability and difficulty in governance.
-
The Articles of Confederation did not create a governmental structure for the states. - This statement is somewhat misleading. The Articles established a framework for a confederation but gave states significant autonomy, which led to fragmentation and inconsistency in governance across the states.
-
The Articles of Confederation did not provide powers for strong individual state governments. - This statement is also misleading. While the Articles allowed for strong state governments, the problem was that it led to a lack of cohesion among the states and conflicts that the federal government could not resolve.
-
The Articles of Confederation did not allow the federal government to deal with foreign countries. - This is partially true, as the federal government had limited powers in foreign relations. Under the Articles, the federal government struggled to negotiate treaties and manage international relations effectively, which weakened the U.S. position abroad.
Overall, the main reason for replacing the Articles was the need for a stronger federal government that could unify the states, manage economic issues, and effectively deal with foreign nations, which the Articles failed to accomplish. This led to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which resulted in the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
3 answers