Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners? (1 point) Responses They had more slaves to help them. They had more slaves to help them. Farming along the coast provided everything they needed. Farming along the coast provided everything they needed. Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops. Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops. Nearly everything they needed was made at home. Nearly everything they needed was made at home.

Answer 1

The correct response is: Nearly everything they needed was made at home.

Backcountry colonists were often more self-sufficient because they relied on subsistence farming and produced most of their own goods, while plantation owners depended on large-scale agriculture and external labor sources (slaves) to produce cash crops for sale.