Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners? (1 point) Responses They had more slaves to help them. They had more slaves to help them. Farming along the coast provided everything they needed. Farming along the coast provided everything they needed. Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops. Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops. Nearly everything they needed was made at home.

1 answer

The correct response is: Nearly everything they needed was made at home.

Backcountry colonists often relied on subsistence farming and produced most of their own goods, while plantation owners were more dependent on cash crops and external markets, which made them less self-sufficient.

Similar Questions
  1. 2 of 102 of 10 ItemsQuestion Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners? (1 point) Responses
    1. answers icon 21 answers
  2. The Southern Colonies QuizWhy were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners? (1 point) Responses They
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners?(1 point) Responses  They had more slaves to help
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners?(1 point) Responses They had more slaves to help
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions