Why was what scientists discovered while studying DNA in 1977 scientifically important?

Question

It proved the existence of DNA.
It confirmed that mRNA in viruses were an outlier.
It showed that DNA is found within genes.
It challenged previous thinking about mRNA.

Answer 1

The scientific importance of the discoveries made while studying DNA in 1977 primarily relates to the development of sequencing techniques and the understanding of genetic information. The work of Frederick Sanger and his colleagues led to the development of DNA sequencing methods, which were crucial for genomic research.

Among the options provided, the most accurate answer is:

It challenged previous thinking about mRNA.

This refers to the understanding that mRNA is not just a messenger carrying information from DNA to proteins; the work also illuminated the complexities of how genes are expressed and regulated. It went on to inform a whole new level of understanding in molecular biology, including the role of mRNA in gene expression and its implications in various biological processes.

Answer 2

Why was what scientists discovered while studying DNA in 1977 scientifically important?

It proved the existence of DNA.
It confirmed that mRNA in viruses were an outlier.
It showed that DNA is found within genes.
It challenged previous thinking about mRNA.

Answer 3

The scientific importance of the discoveries made in 1977 primarily revolves around the development of DNA sequencing techniques, notably through the work of Frederick Sanger and others. This advancement was crucial for the field of molecular biology and genomics.

Among the options you've provided, the most relevant choice is:

It challenged previous thinking about mRNA.

This discovery helped reshape our understanding of genetic information, particularly regarding the function of mRNA in the context of gene expression and its significance in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Sanger's work contributed to the realization that the processes involved in coding and expression of genes were more complex than previously thought.

Answer 4

If a biologist wants other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, what would be the most effective method for doing so? (1 point)
provide evidence to support the argument
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
conduct an experiment to study the argument
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation

Answer 5

The most effective method for a biologist to gain acceptance of a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs would be to:

provide evidence to support the argument.

While conducting an experiment or generating a testable question are important steps in the scientific process, ultimately, other scientists will need to see compelling evidence that supports the new argument in order to accept it. Well-documented evidence, whether from experiments, observations, or literature reviews, is critical for persuading the scientific community.

Answer 6

If a biologist wants other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, what would be the most effective method for doing so?

provide evidence to support the argument
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
conduct an experiment to study the argument
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation

Answer 7

To effectively convince other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, the best approach would be to:

conduct an experiment to study the argument.

Conducting an experiment allows the biologist to generate new data and evidence that can substantiate the argument. While providing evidence, writing a paper, and generating testable questions are important parts of the scientific process, actual experimental results can offer strong, objective support for the argument and are often seen as the most credible way to establish scientific claims.