Concrete was better than stone for building in the Roman Empire primarily because it was stronger and more durable than stone. This allowed for the construction of more impressive, long-lasting structures, including buildings, roads, and aqueducts, which contributed significantly to the architectural achievements of the Romans.
Why was concrete better than stone for building in the Roman empire? (1 point) Responses It was more flexible than stone when dry. It was more flexible than stone when dry. It was heavier than stone when dry. It was heavier than stone when dry. It was lighter and easier to use than stone. It was lighter and easier to use than stone. It was stronger and more durable than stone. It was stronger and more durable than stone.
1 answer
1 answer