A judge might refuse to hear a job-related dispute about how much a company is paying its workers for the reason that other remedies are considered to be available. This means that the legal system recognizes alternative avenues for resolving such disputes, like arbitration or administrative procedures under labor laws, which may be deemed more appropriate for handling employment-related issues.
The other options provided are less relevant in this context:
- A judge only has authority in his or hers own courtroom: This statement is overly broad and does not address the specifics of employment disputes.
- It is considered a moot question: This would imply that the issue is no longer relevant or has no practical significance, which may not be the case in wage disputes.
- It is considered a political question: This typically applies to matters that are fundamentally about policy choices and often outside of judicial purview, but wage disputes usually fall under legal considerations rather than political ones.
So, the most fitting reason for a judge's refusal in this context would be related to the availability of other remedies.
1 answer