To determine the types of rhetoric used in the title "Why Journalism Has a Gender Problem" by Corinne Segal, we can analyze the elements at play:
-
Logos: This refers to logical reasoning and arguments based on facts and evidence. The title suggests that there is a logical discussion about the existence of a problem in journalism related to gender, so logos may be a valid option.
-
Ethos: This refers to credibility and the character of the author. If the author is recognized as an authority on journalism or gender issues, then there's an element of ethos present. However, the title alone doesn't provide enough context to affirm this.
-
Pathos: This refers to emotional appeal. While the title could evoke concern or interest regarding gender issues in journalism, it doesn't explicitly indicate a strong emotional appeal.
-
Deductive reasoning: This involves reasoning from general premises to a specific conclusion. The title doesn’t show this clear structure.
-
Inductive reasoning: This involves drawing general conclusions from specific examples or evidence. The title does not indicate that specific instances are being considered to reach a broader conclusion.
Based on this analysis, the two types of rhetoric that the author likely employs would be:
- Logos: because it implies a logical argument about journalism's issues with gender.
- Ethos: if the author provides a credible examination of gender in journalism.
Therefore, the correct answers would be: logos and ethos.
1 answer