To determine how paragraph 4 refines the central idea of “Why Journalism Has a Gender Problem” by Corinne Segal, we need to understand how it contributes to the overall argument presented in the article. Each of your options presents a different way that a paragraph may refine or support the central idea:
-
It provides facts or statistics that help prove the central claim: This option suggests that the paragraph strengthens the argument by providing empirical evidence.
-
It gives further detail about how the studies will help humans: This implies that the paragraph discusses the broader implications of the research findings.
-
It explains important background information that will help readers understand the central idea: This option indicates that the paragraph serves to set the stage for the reader’s understanding of the topic.
-
It restates the central idea with a change in nuance after presenting data: This suggests that the paragraph revisits the central idea but elaborates on it by considering new information or perspectives.
Without the actual text of paragraph 4 to analyze, I suggest considering which of these options aligns with the content of that paragraph as you read it. Each option has merit, but the best choice would depend on the specific details provided in paragraph 4 regarding the central idea as articulated earlier in the piece.