Why is there a historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China? (1 point) Responses The Great Wall was successful at keeping invaders out, but it was a costly project to build. The Great Wall was successful at keeping invaders out, but it was a costly project to build. The emperor's advisors refused to build the Great Wall although it proved to be a success. The emperor's advisors refused to build the Great Wall although it proved to be a success. The cruelty of the emperor caused suffering although the Great Wall was an achievement in defense. The cruelty of the emperor caused suffering although the Great Wall was an achievement in defense. The Great Wall today is considered an eyesore, although it was necessary in the emperor's time/

Answer 1

The historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China often centers on its effectiveness, the human cost of its construction, and the context of its building. While the wall was a significant achievement in terms of defense against invasions, the construction process caused immense suffering and loss of life among workers, often due to harsh conditions and forced labor. Additionally, opinions vary on its long-term effectiveness, as it did not entirely prevent invasions and was sometimes breached. These factors contribute to the complexities of evaluating the Great Wall's legacy in Chinese history.

Among the responses you provided, the most accurate reflection of this debate would be: "The cruelty of the emperor caused suffering although the Great Wall was an achievement in defense." This statement captures the duality of the Great Wall's significance as both a defensive achievement and a project associated with human suffering.