The thesis statement "The life of Nelson Mandela was long and challenging" is considered weak for several reasons, primarily because it lacks specificity and depth. Here’s an analysis of the provided options:
-
It is a description of what will be discussed in the essay. - This is partially correct, as the statement does introduce the topic but does not give any indication of what specific aspects of Mandela’s life will be explored.
-
It is too broad. - This is also correct; the terms "long" and "challenging" are vague and do not provide a clear focus for the essay. The statement fails to specify any major events, achievements, or themes related to Mandela’s life.
-
It makes an unreasonable or outrageous claim or insults the opposing side. - This does not apply to the thesis statement in question. It is not making a claim that could be considered outrageous or insulting; rather, it is simply stating a factual observation about Mandela’s life.
-
It is simply a declaration of the subject. - This is accurate as well; the thesis does not articulate a specific argument or perspective, merely stating that Mandela's life was long and challenging without any interpretation or insights.
Overall, the best reasons for why this thesis statement is weak would combine the elements of it being too broad and simply a declaration of the subject. A stronger thesis would provide a clear argument or perspective about Mandela’s life and its significance.
1 answer