Why is it important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis?(1 point)

Question

Responses which is the true correct answer solve it and tell me why

Primary sources make connections between different types of information, which can help researchers.
Primary sources make connections between different types of information, which can help researchers.

Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.
Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.

Primary sources are the only way to learn anything about the past.
Primary sources are the only way to learn anything about the past.

Primary sources are created out of many different sources and thus provide the best information for researchers.

Answer 1

The correct answer is:

Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.

Explanation:

Primary sources are original documents or physical objects created at the time of an event or by individuals directly involved in the events being studied. These can include letters, diaries, photographs, official documents, and interviews. The significance of using primary sources in historical research lies in their authenticity and immediacy; they provide direct evidence and insights that secondary sources—such as textbooks, articles, or analyses—cannot offer to the same extent.

Using primary sources allows researchers to gain a deeper understanding of historical contexts, perspectives, and nuances that might be overlooked in later interpretations. They provide critical details and unique viewpoints that contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the past.

While the other responses contain some truth, they do not capture the primary importance of firsthand accounts and the direct insights they offer for historical analysis.