The Micmac perspective on happiness, as suggested in your question, revolves around a few key ideas that contrast the lifestyles and values of American Indians and the French.
-
Contentment with Simplicity: The Micmac likely believe that American Indians are happier because they live in a way that values contentment with what they have. They may perceive the French as burdened by material possessions and societal expectations, leading to stress and unhappiness.
-
Connection to Nature: The emphasis on hunting and fishing as sources of pleasure suggests a deep connection to nature, which can offer fulfillment, peace, and a sense of community. This contrasts with a lifestyle that prioritizes relentless labor for material gain, which may lead to dissatisfaction despite having more possessions.
-
Subjective Well-Being: The statement that “there is no Indian who does not consider himself infinitely more happy and more powerful than the French” highlights a subjective sense of well-being. Happiness is often tied not just to what one has, but to one's perception of life, purpose, and fulfillment.
-
Quality of Life: The notion that American Indians live longer could be linked to a lifestyle that avoids the stressors associated with modern consumerism.
In summary, the Micmac likely see happiness as stemming from a harmonious relationship with nature, community, and a sense of contentment, contrasting sharply with the perceived burdens of societal ambition and excess found in French culture.