Why does Reverend Halle quit the court at the end of Act3?How has he changed since Act 1?Why do you think miller chose to develop Hale’s character this way?

1 answer

In Arthur Miller's play "The Crucible," Reverend Hale's decision to quit the court at the end of Act 3 marks a significant turning point in his character arc. Initially, in Act 1, Hale is portrayed as a confident, zealous witch-hunter who believes in the righteousness of his mission to root out witchcraft in Salem. He approaches the trials with a firm belief that he can find and eradicate evil, and he is eager to apply his knowledge and authority to help the community.

However, by the end of Act 3, Hale undergoes a profound transformation. He witnesses the corruption of the court system, the manipulation of truth, and the devastating consequences of blind allegiance to authority. As he sees innocent people being condemned based on dubious evidence and personal vendettas, he becomes disillusioned with the process and realizes that his initial convictions were misguided. His decision to quit the court signifies his rejection of a system that he once supported, illustrating his moral awakening and the internal conflict he faces.

Miller likely chose to develop Hale’s character in this way to emphasize the themes of integrity, conscience, and the danger of dogma. Hale represents the journey from ignorance to awareness, reflecting a broader commentary on the consequences of fanaticism and the importance of questioning authority. His evolution serves as a critique of the hysteria that gripped Salem and acts as a cautionary tale about the potential for rational individuals to become complicit in injustice. Through Hale, Miller highlights the struggle between individual morality and societal pressure, ultimately advocating for a principled stand against wrongdoing, even in the face of overwhelming opposition.