The question "Why do you think cyclists don’t deserve better options for bike infrastructure?" is primarily a challenge question. It prompts the respondent to reflect on and potentially defend their perspective regarding the perceived lack of deservingness of cyclists for improved infrastructure. It challenges existing views and assumptions about transportation equity and the prioritization of different types of road users.
Why do you think cyclists don’t deserve better options for bike infrastructure? What type of question is this? Cause and effect, relational, challenge or exploratory
1 answer
1 answer