The scientific community initially did not accept the continental drift theory proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century for several reasons, which can be summarized as:
-
Lack of a Mechanism: One of the main criticisms of Wegener's theory was that he could not provide a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. He suggested that continents drifted through the ocean crust, but this idea lacked supporting evidence and a scientific basis. The lack of a physical mechanism for continental movement was a significant factor in the skepticism toward the theory.
-
Insufficient Evidence: While Wegener presented various pieces of evidence for continental drift, such as the fit of the continents, fossil correlations, and geological similarities across oceans, many scientists believed that the evidence was not conclusive enough to warrant acceptance of the theory. They argued that the similarities could be explained by other means, such as land bridges or similar climatic conditions.
-
Geological Paradigms at the Time: The prevailing geological paradigms of the time, which included concepts like land bridges and fixed continents, made it difficult for scientists to accept Wegener's ideas. Many geologists were committed to theories of the time that did not accommodate the notion of moving continents.
-
Perception of the Theory: Some scientists viewed the idea of continental drift as radical or "crazy," given the conventional understanding of geology. This perception contributed to a reluctance to explore and accept Wegener's ideas.
Despite these challenges, the continental drift theory laid the groundwork for the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s, which provided the needed mechanisms for continental movement and the acceptance of the idea within the scientific community.
1 answer