Why did the Founders decide that a republic was a better choice for the government than a direct democracy?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

A republic allowed elected representatives to make laws, which was more efficient than every citizen voting for each law.
A republic allowed elected representatives to make laws, which was more efficient than every citizen voting for each law.

A republic was a more modern form of government since it came from Roman times, so it was more appropriate for the newly formed United States.
A republic was a more modern form of government since it came from Roman times, so it was more appropriate for the newly formed United States.

A republic was more inclusive than a direct democracy since it allowed everyone to be a citizen.
A republic was more inclusive than a direct democracy since it allowed everyone to be a citizen.

A republic encouraged trial by jury which protected the rights of the accused while direct democracies did not always offer those protections.
A republic encouraged trial by jury which protected the rights of the accused while direct democracies did not always offer those protections.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

The correct response is:

A republic allowed elected representatives to make laws, which was more efficient than every citizen voting for each law.

The Founders believed that a republic, with its system of elected representatives, would create a more efficient and stable government that could make informed decisions on behalf of the citizens, rather than requiring all citizens to vote directly on every single law and policy. This structure was designed to balance the needs for both popular participation and effective governance.