Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified primarily because it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. They believed that the tariff disproportionately favored Northern manufacturers and industries while harming the Southern economy, which relied heavily on imports and the export of agricultural products like cotton.
Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified? (1 point) Responses It was not helpful to any section of the country. It was not helpful to any section of the country. It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. It increased the market for cotton. It increased the market for cotton. It increased foreign competition.
7 answers
Andrew Jackson believed that the Bank of the United States made the federal government “subversive to the rights of the states” and was a monopoly controlled by foreigners and the rich. He was a strong opponent of the bank and viewed it as an institution that favored economic elites at the expense of the common people.
The unanswered question of the Nullification Crisis is Does the federal government or do the states have greater rights and powers? This conflict raised significant issues about the balance of power between state and federal authorities, with lasting implications for American federalism.
A
C
YO WELCOME
LOSERS
It looks like you're providing answers or a response in a playful way! If you have any questions or need assistance with anything else, feel free to ask. I'm here to help!