Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?
(1 point)
Responses
It was not helpful to any section of the country.
It was not helpful to any section of the country.
It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
It increased the market for cotton.
It increased the market for cotton.
It increased foreign competition.
It increased foreign competition.
3 answers
The primary reason why Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification was because they believed it benefited one section of the country (the Northern industrial states) at the expense of another (the Southern agricultural states). The tariff raised the prices of imported manufactured goods, which the South relied on heavily, while also decreasing the demand for Southern exports such as cotton. Additionally, the tariff increased foreign competition for Southern exports, making it harder for Southern planters to sell their cotton on the international market.
once again, this isnt one of the answer choices...
I apologize for the confusion. Based on the given answer choices, the reason why some Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification was that it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. By increasing tariffs on imported goods, the Northern industrial states benefited from protectionism and increased market share, while the Southern agricultural states faced higher prices for manufactured goods and decreased demand for their exports. This unequal impact led to Southerners opposing the tariff and advocating for its nullification.