Why did nuclear arms remain a threat after the Cold War?
A. Israel, India, and Pakistan refused to reduce their stock of nuclear weapons.
B. The old Soviet Union was unwilling to sign START, the arms-reduction treaty.
C. The United States had shared too much nuclear technology with now-hostile countries.
D. North Korea had shared dangerous nuclear-weapons plans with India.
7 answers
A. Israel, India, and Pakistan refused to reduce their stock of nuclear weapons.
Which statement best explains why the United States supported the harsh governments of El Salvador and Guatemala?
A. The United States benefited from an economic relationship with both countries.
B. U.S. policy supported democracies throughout Latin America.
C. El Salvador and Guatemala were fighting communist rebels.
D. El Salvador and Guatemala were allies against the Sandinistas.
A. The United States benefited from an economic relationship with both countries.
B. U.S. policy supported democracies throughout Latin America.
C. El Salvador and Guatemala were fighting communist rebels.
D. El Salvador and Guatemala were allies against the Sandinistas.
C. El Salvador and Guatemala were fighting communist rebels.
Explain how members of the Reagan administration acted illegally to sell arms to Iran and aid the Contras in Nicaragua. In a paragraph, give reasons for and against these actions, and evaluate their impact.
Members of the Reagan administration acted illegally to sell arms to Iran and aid the Contras in Nicaragua through the Iran-Contra affair. The arms sales to Iran were conducted in secret in order to fund the Contras who were fighting against the Sandinista government in Nicaragua, despite Congress having explicitly banned aid to the Contras. This was done in an attempt to secure the release of American hostages in Lebanon and to further U.S. interests in the region.
Reasons for these actions include the desire to counter communist influence in Central America and to support anti-communist forces aligned with U.S. interests. Some believed that the ends justified the means, and that supporting anti-communist groups was necessary for U.S. national security.
Arguments against these actions include that they were illegal and violated the Constitution's separation of powers, as Congress did not authorize the funds to aid the Contras. This undermined democracy and the rule of law, and damaged the credibility of the U.S. internationally.
The impact of these actions was significant. The Iran-Contra affair led to a series of investigations and indictments, damaging the reputation of the Reagan administration. It also strained relations with Congress and raised questions about the ethics and legality of U.S. foreign policy. The affair highlighted the risks of executive overreach and the potential consequences of covert operations conducted without proper oversight.
Reasons for these actions include the desire to counter communist influence in Central America and to support anti-communist forces aligned with U.S. interests. Some believed that the ends justified the means, and that supporting anti-communist groups was necessary for U.S. national security.
Arguments against these actions include that they were illegal and violated the Constitution's separation of powers, as Congress did not authorize the funds to aid the Contras. This undermined democracy and the rule of law, and damaged the credibility of the U.S. internationally.
The impact of these actions was significant. The Iran-Contra affair led to a series of investigations and indictments, damaging the reputation of the Reagan administration. It also strained relations with Congress and raised questions about the ethics and legality of U.S. foreign policy. The affair highlighted the risks of executive overreach and the potential consequences of covert operations conducted without proper oversight.
Make it a little shorter, please.
Members of the Reagan administration acted illegally by selling arms to Iran and supporting the Contras in Nicaragua through the Iran-Contra affair. Reasons for these actions include the desire to counter communist influence in the region and support anti-communist forces. However, these actions were illegal, undermined democratic principles, and damaged the credibility of the U.S. internationally. The impact was significant, leading to investigations, indictments, strained relations with Congress, and questions about the ethics and legality of U.S. foreign policy and covert operations.