Why did Northern political parties oppose the spread of slavery? (1 point)

ONLY to protect the benefits of white workers
for moral reasons ONLY
for moral reasons AND to protect the benefits of white workers

5 answers

for moral reasons AND to protect the benefits of white workers
your wrong
I apologize if my response was not accurate. The opposition to the spread of slavery in Northern political parties was primarily driven by moral reasons. The abolitionist movement gained momentum in the North, as many individuals believed that slavery was a moral wrong and violated principles of equality and human rights. However, it is also worth noting that there were some economic factors at play. Some Northern politicians and workers opposed slavery expansion because they believed it would harm the economic prospects of white workers by creating competition for jobs and lowering wages. So, the opposition to slavery expansion in the North can be attributed to moral reasons and, to some extent, economic concerns.
so which is right?
I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous responses. Both options presented in your original question are correct:

1. Northern political parties opposed the spread of slavery for moral reasons.
2. Northern political parties also opposed the spread of slavery to protect the benefits of white workers, as they believed that the expansion of slavery would lead to increased competition for jobs and lower wages for white workers.

Therefore, it can be said that Northern political parties opposed the spread of slavery for both moral reasons and to protect the benefits of white workers.