Why did Generals Grant and Sherman use a total war strategy and how did that strategy contribute to the end of the war? Write like a student.

1 answer

Generals Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman employed a total war strategy during the American Civil War for several reasons, and it played a crucial role in bringing the conflict to an end.

Firstly, the total war strategy was grounded in the belief that defeating the Confederacy required not only a military victory but also a crippling blow to the South's economic and social fabric. By targeting not just the Confederate army but also the resources that supported it, including infrastructure, supplies, and civilian morale, Grant and Sherman aimed to hasten the collapse of the Southern war effort. This approach was demonstrated in Sherman’s infamous March to the Sea, where he and his troops marched from Atlanta to Savannah, destroying railroads, factories, and farms along the way. The destruction of these resources weakened the South’s ability to sustain its military operations and put immense psychological pressure on the civilian population.

Secondly, the total war strategy sought to shorten the conflict by ending it decisively rather than prolonging it through traditional battlefield engagements. Grant implemented this by engaging in a series of relentless offensives, such as the Overland Campaign, where he faced off against General Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. Grant’s willingness to sustain heavy casualties indicated his commitment to wearing down the Confederate forces until they could no longer continue fighting. This constant pressure ultimately diminished Confederate morale and capacity, contributing to the sense that victory was unattainable for the South.

Additionally, Grant and Sherman understood that the war was not just a struggle between armies but also a clash of societies. By targeting the Southern economy and civilian infrastructure, they aimed to undermine the resolve of the Southern populace and encourage dissent against the Confederate government. The destruction of property and resources illustrated the severe consequences of continuing the war, which helped to shift public opinion in the South over time.

In conclusion, the total war strategy employed by Generals Grant and Sherman was a decisive factor in the Union’s victory in the Civil War. By systematically dismantling the economic and social structures that sustained the Confederate war effort and applying relentless military pressure, they effectively contributed to the rapid conclusion of the conflict, leading to the eventual surrender of Confederate forces. This approach ultimately highlighted the interconnectedness of military and civilian efforts in a total war context, reshaping the landscape of American warfare.