Eyewitness accounts are less reliable than statistical data primarily because eyewitness accounts rely on the viewpoints of specific people and could be biased, which makes them more subjective. Unlike statistical data, which is gathered and analyzed systematically, eyewitness testimonies can be influenced by factors such as personal perceptions, memories, emotions, and potential biases, leading to inaccuracies.
Why are eyewitness accounts less reliable than statistical data?(1 point) Responses Eyewitness accounts can be challenged by secondary sources that are written after an event occurred. Eyewitness accounts can be challenged by secondary sources that are written after an event occurred. Eyewitness accounts require great effort to obtain since few people want to share their experiences on record. Eyewitness accounts require great effort to obtain since few people want to share their experiences on record. Eyewitness accounts are considered primary sources because they were documented at the time an incident occurred. Eyewitness accounts are considered primary sources because they were documented at the time an incident occurred. Eyewitness accounts rely on the viewpoints of specific people and could be biased, which makes them more subjective.
1 answer