Which would be considered a reliable source?(1 point)
Responses
a blog written by an anonymous author
a blog written by an anonymous author
an article from a scientific journal
an article from a scientific journal
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
a biology textbook from 1920
a biology textbook from 1920
9 answers
an article from a scientific journal
Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
Responses
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
Which question can be used to evaluate reliability of a source?(1 point)
Responses
"Is the author American?"
"Is the author American?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
Responses
"Is the author American?"
"Is the author American?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
"Is the research peer-reviewed?"
Validity refers to(1 point)
Responses
originality.
originality.
accuracy.
accuracy.
consistency.
consistency.
reliability.
reliability.
Responses
originality.
originality.
accuracy.
accuracy.
consistency.
consistency.
reliability.
reliability.
accuracy.
To corroborate information is to(1 point)
Responses
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
Responses
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.