In evaluating the reasons why metal colonies (often referring to the Middle Colonies, where mixed agriculture was common) were considered more favorable to farmers than New England, the following points could be selected:
-
The growing season was longer - This is true; the Middle Colonies generally had a longer growing season compared to New England, allowing for a wider variety of crops and a more productive agricultural calendar.
-
The soil was more fertile - This is accurate; the soil in the Middle Colonies was often more fertile than that in New England, which benefited crop production.
-
Crops grew along the coast - This statement could be true, but it's more nuanced. While crops could grow along the coast, the fertile inland areas were more significant for agriculture.
-
There were more people to tend to the farms - This could be considered true in the context of the population distribution and settlement patterns in the Middle Colonies, which had a diverse population and often more labor availability.
Based on this analysis, the significant reasons would be the longer growing season and more fertile soil. The other points may need more context to accurately evaluate their significance.