There was much more coverage throughout the world concerning the Rwandan Genocide than the September 11 attacks.
There was much more coverage throughout the world concerning the Rwandan Genocide than the September 11 attacks.
There was an equal amount of coverage throughout the world concerning the September 11 attacks and the Rwandan Genocide.
There was an equal amount of coverage throughout the world concerning the September 11 attacks and the Rwandan Genocide.
In some countries, there was more coverage about the Rwandan Genocide, and in other countries, there was more coverage about the September 11 attacks on the U.S.
In some countries, there was more coverage about the Rwandan Genocide, and in other countries, there was more coverage about the September 11 attacks on the U.S.
There was much more coverage throughout the world concerning the September 11 attacks than the Rwandan Genocide.
1 answer
The statement that offers the best example of a contrast between many countries’ responses to the Rwandan Genocide and the September 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S. is:
There was much more coverage throughout the world concerning the September 11 attacks than the Rwandan Genocide.
This statement highlights the significant difference in international media attention and public discourse regarding the two events, reflecting contrasting global responses.
