Which statement is an example providing evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation?(1 point) Responses Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter. Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter. Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit. Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit. Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel. Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel. Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.

asked anonymously

5 months ago

28 views

0

0

1 answer

The statement that best provides evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation is:

"Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter."

This statement clearly illustrates the difference: the law describes a consistent observation (the action-reaction principle), while the theory provides an explanation for the underlying mechanisms (electrostatic forces).

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

Question

Which statement is an example providing evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation?(1 point) Responses Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter. Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter. Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit. Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit. Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel. Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel. Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.

1 answer

The statement that best provides evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation is:

"Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter."

This statement clearly illustrates the difference: the law describes a consistent observation (the action-reaction principle), while the theory provides an explanation for the underlying mechanisms (electrostatic forces).

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The statement that best provides evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation is:

"Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter."

This statement clearly illustrates the difference: the law describes a consistent observation (the action-reaction principle), while the theory provides an explanation for the underlying mechanisms (electrostatic forces).