Which statement is an example providing evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.
Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.

Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.
Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.

Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.
Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.

Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.

Answer 1

The statement that best provides evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation is:

Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.

This statement exemplifies how a law describes a consistent relationship observed in nature, while a theory provides an explanation for why that relationship occurs.