Which statement from the dissenting opinion of tinker v desmoines court decision best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protestors was not within the protection of the free speech of the first amendment

even a casual reading of the record shows that his armband did divvert students minds from their regular lessons and that talk comments etc made john tinker self conscious in attending school with his armband
there is also evidens that a teach of mathemetics had his lesson period practically wreckes chiefly by disputes with mary beth tinker who wore her armband for her demonstration
in cox v lousiana the court clearly stated that the rights free speech and assembly do not mean that everyone with opinions or beliefd to express may address a group at any public place and at any time
the case therefore wholly without constitutional reasons in my judgement subjects all the public schools in the country to the whims and caprices of their loudest mouthed but maybe not their brightest students

1 answer

The statement "even a casual reading of the record shows that his armband did divert students minds from their regular lessons and that talk comments etc made John Tinker self conscious in attending school with his armband" best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protestors was not within the protection of the free speech of the First Amendment.