Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case? (1 point)

Question

• The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
Fourteenth Amendment was interpreted to include the due process dause of the
• The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
Toe stutime Court does not have the authority to interpret any armendment in the

Answer 1

The best statement that identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case is:

• The Fourteenth Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Second Amendment.

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in one’s home is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.