Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?(1 point)

Question

Responses

a The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

b The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.

c The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution.

d The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment

Answer 1

a The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.