Which statement best identifies how the decision in the United States v Eichmann case was a result of constitutional interpretation?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The Supreme Court used the Flag Protection Act to make a decision
The Supreme Court used the Flag Protection Act to make a decision

Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression
Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression

The Supreme Court followed the Constitution exactly and no interpretations were made in this case
The Supreme Court followed the Constitution exactly and no interpretations were made in this case

The Supreme Court reconsidered the language of the Fourteenth Amendment

Answer 1

Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression