Which statement best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AOrganizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease.%0D%0AOrganizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease.%0D%0A%0D%0ADiseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.%0D%0ADiseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.%0D%0A%0D%0ASufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.%0D%0ASufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.%0D%0A%0D%0ACorporations refuse to fund research for rare diseases.

1 answer

The best statement to explain why a rare disease might receive more research funding than a more common disease is: "Sufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign."

This implies that increased awareness and advocacy can lead to more funding opportunities for research, even if the disease is rare, as it can galvanize support from organizations and the public.