Which statement best describes why the steady state theory cannot explain the radiation detected in space?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

The theory is based on the idea that the density of the universe never changes; therefore, information about radiation would not be present in the theory.
The theory is based on the idea that the density of the universe never changes; therefore, information about radiation would not be present in the theory.

The theory is based on the idea that galaxies and stars are continuously replaced; therefore, facts about radiations would not be included in the theory.
The theory is based on the idea that galaxies and stars are continuously replaced; therefore, facts about radiations would not be included in the theory.

The theory is based on the idea that there is no end to the universe; therefore, findings of radiation would not be accounted for in the theory.
The theory is based on the idea that there is no end to the universe; therefore, findings of radiation would not be accounted for in the theory.

The theory is based on the idea that an explosion did not occur; therefore, evidence of radiation would not be predicted in the theory.
The theory is based on the idea that an explosion did not occur; therefore, evidence of radiation would not be predicted in the theory.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

The statement that best describes why the steady state theory cannot explain the radiation detected in space is:

The theory is based on the idea that an explosion did not occur; therefore, evidence of radiation would not be predicted in the theory.

This is because the steady state theory posits a continuous creation of matter to maintain a constant density in an expanding universe, which does not account for the background radiation that is consistent with the Big Bang theory. The existence of cosmic microwave background radiation is predicted by the Big Bang theory, while the steady state theory does not include a mechanism for such radiation.