To determine which statement best describes how the structures of "Bold to Boulder" and "Lost in My Mind" contribute to their meaning, we need to consider the characteristics of narrative and poetic techniques.
A) This statement suggests that dialogue is used in both texts but for different purposes. This could be valid if both texts include dialogue that does serve these roles effectively.
B) This statement mentions a subplot and a refrain, which could be true; however, without context, it's hard to say definitively how they contribute to meaning without seeing the specific texts.
C) This suggests both texts use exaggeration to underline the main problem, which could serve to emphasize the stakes or intensity of the narratives.
D) This claims that both texts hint at resolutions early on, which could create anticipation, but it doesn't indicate how this affects the overall meaning deeply.
Without additional context about the contents of the texts "Bold to Boulder" and "Lost in My Mind," it's difficult to choose definitively. However, if both texts communicate some form of emotional complexity or resolution hint at a larger theme, A or D may be particularly strong choices. If the problem's intensity is underlined by both, then C may also be valid.
Ultimately, if I had to choose one based on common narrative and poetic techniques, I would select A, as dialogue often reveals character emotions and sets tone effectively in both storytelling and poetry.