Which statement best assesses how Supreme Court decisions have impacted freedom of the press?(1 point)
Responses
Supreme Court decisions have determined that prior restraint is unconstitutional.
Supreme Court decisions have determined that prior restraint is unconstitutional.
Supreme Court decisions have failed to make consistent decisions regarding freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have failed to make consistent decisions regarding freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently limited freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently limited freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected and expanded the freedom of the press.
2 answers
Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected and expanded the freedom of the press.
1. Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected an expanded the freedom of the press.
2. New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue changes of libel in the case of a public official.
3. It’s at the standard for what it meant for government to violate the establishment clause.
4. To protect other members of society.
5. A person breaks a policy of their employer to participate in a religious ceremony
Sorry if any words are off I used to voice to text
2. New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue changes of libel in the case of a public official.
3. It’s at the standard for what it meant for government to violate the establishment clause.
4. To protect other members of society.
5. A person breaks a policy of their employer to participate in a religious ceremony
Sorry if any words are off I used to voice to text