Which statement best analyzes the disadvantages of lifetime appointments for federal judges?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Appointment by the president who appointed them can sway their rulings.
Appointment by the president who appointed them can sway their rulings.

Less frequent turnover creates problems with positions being available for new judges being appointed.
Less frequent turnover creates problems with positions being available for new judges being appointed.

Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits.
Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits.

Judges are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, making them more vulnerable to influenced decision making.

Answer 1

The statement that best analyzes the disadvantages of lifetime appointments for federal judges is:

Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits.

This statement specifically addresses a potential issue that arises from lifetime appointments, focusing on the implications of aging on a judge's ability to perform their duties effectively over time.