The statement that best analyzes the disadvantages of lifetime appointments for federal judges is: Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits. This addresses a specific concern regarding the impact of age on a judge's ability to perform their duties effectively over a potentially long tenure, highlighting a key disadvantage of lifetime appointments.
Which statement best analyzes the disadvantages of lifetime appointments for federal judges?(1 point) Responses Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits. Diminished mental clarity and stamina could impede judges from fully carrying out their assigned duties without age and term limits. Judges are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, making them more vulnerable to influenced decision making. Judges are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, making them more vulnerable to influenced decision making. Less frequent turnover creates problems with positions being available for new judges being appointed. Less frequent turnover creates problems with positions being available for new judges being appointed. Appointment by the president who appointed them can sway their rulings.
5 answers
What is the reason for giving the president the power to make federal judge appointments?(1 point) Responses The acting president appoints federal judges so they can choose individuals who will rule on cases in their favor. The acting president appoints federal judges so they can choose individuals who will rule on cases in their favor. The acting president appoints federal judges as a way to enforce the system of checks and balances. The acting president appoints federal judges as a way to enforce the system of checks and balances. The acting president appoints federal judges to make the executive branch more powerful than the legislative branch. The acting president appoints federal judges to make the executive branch more powerful than the legislative branch. The acting president appoints federal judges that will carry out their wishes after they have left office.
The best reason for giving the president the power to make federal judge appointments is: The acting president appoints federal judges as a way to enforce the system of checks and balances. This aligns with the constitutional framework designed to ensure that no single branch of government becomes too powerful, promoting a balance among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
Which answer best defines the power given to the Supreme Court in regard to original and appellate jurisdiction?(1 point) Responses The Supreme Court is only provided appellate jurisdiction if the case has previously been heard in a lower court. The Supreme Court is only provided appellate jurisdiction if the case has previously been heard in a lower court. The Supreme Court has complete jurisdiction in all cases at a state and federal level. The Supreme Court has complete jurisdiction in all cases at a state and federal level. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional law or federal statutes and has appellate jurisdiction from lower courts. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional law or federal statutes and has appellate jurisdiction from lower courts. The Supreme Court is only provided original jurisdiction and is not able to hear appeals on a case. The Supreme Court is only provided original jurisdiction and is not able to hear appeals on a case.
The answer that best defines the power given to the Supreme Court in regard to original and appellate jurisdiction is: The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional law or federal statutes and has appellate jurisdiction from lower courts. This accurately reflects the scope of the Supreme Court's authority, which includes both original jurisdiction in specific cases and appellate jurisdiction in cases that come from lower courts.
1 answer