Which statement best analyzes how gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation?(1 point) Responses Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it creates voting districts that require people to vote for specific candidates. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it creates voting districts that require people to vote for specific candidates. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it makes people ineligible to vote. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it makes people ineligible to vote. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because lawmakers can redraw districts before every election. Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because lawmakers can redraw districts before every election.

Answer 1

The statement that best analyzes how gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation is:

"Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party."

This statement clearly articulates how gerrymandering can manipulate electoral outcomes to favor one political party over others, undermining the principle of fair representation.