To analyze the equation \( 45w + 123.95 = 753.95 \), let's break down its components:
- \( 45w \) suggests that the total cost increases by $45 for each week, indicating a weekly fee.
- \( 123.95 \) represents a fixed cost, such as a registration fee that is paid upfront.
- \( 753.95 \) is the total amount paid, which includes both the fixed cost and the variable cost based on the number of weeks enrolled.
Now, let's relate this equation to the options presented:
-
Option A: Erica paid $753.95 for dance classes. She paid a $123.95 registration fee and $45 for each week she enrolled in the classes. What is \( w \), the number of weeks Erica was enrolled?
- This matches perfectly with our equation since it reflects a registration fee and a weekly cost, leading us to conclude that \( w \) represents the number of weeks Erica was enrolled.
-
Option B: Erica paid $753.95 for dance classes. She paid a $45 registration fee for each week she was enrolled. This would not fit the equation because it mischaracterizes the costs involved.
-
Option C: Erica and her sister paid $753.95 for dance classes. This introduces a second person and changes the interpretation of the cost structure. The relationship of the variables does not match the original equation.
-
Option D: Erica paid $753.95 for dance classes, but her costs are defined incorrectly by mixing in a coupon that adjusts the weekly cost. This does not align with the equation.
Thus, the situation best represented by the equation \( 45w + 123.95 = 753.95 \) is:
A. Erica paid $753.95 for dance classes. She paid a $123.95 registration fee and $45 for each week she enrolled in the classes. What is \( w \), the number of weeks Erica was enrolled in dance classes?
When you plug in \( w = 14 \):
\[ 45(14) + 123.95 = 630 + 123.95 = 753.95, \]
which confirms that \( w \) represents the number of weeks enrolled.