To identify the correct form of the sequence defined by the notation \( a_1 = 6; \) and \( a_n = a_{n-1} + 2 \), we need to analyze the recursive definition.
- Initial term: \( a_1 = 6 \)
- Recursion: Each subsequent term can be found by adding 2 to the previous term.
Let's explore the first few terms of the sequence:
- \( a_1 = 6 \)
- \( a_2 = a_1 + 2 = 6 + 2 = 8 \)
- \( a_3 = a_2 + 2 = 8 + 2 = 10 \)
- \( a_4 = a_3 + 2 = 10 + 2 = 12 \)
- \( a_5 = a_4 + 2 = 12 + 2 = 14 \)
- \( a_6 = a_5 + 2 = 14 + 2 = 16 \)
The sequence continues as: \[ 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, \ldots \]
This matches the option:
- \( a_n = 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, \ldots \)
However, none of the options correctly starts with 6. Still, let's analyze the options provided:
- \( a_n = 6 + 2n \): This is not correct because it does not match with the initial term and the sequence derived.
- \( a_n = 4 + 2n \): This will yield a different starting value as it would start from 4, which is not correct.
- \( a_n = 6, 4, 2, 0, -2, \ldots \): This is a decreasing sequence and does not match our derived sequence.
- \( a_n = 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, \ldots \): The correct pattern \( a_2, a_3, \ldots \) but not including \( a_1 = 6 \).
Given that none of the options perfectly represent the sequence defined, but the closest logical sequence that starts from the second term is:
The best choice based on the pattern shown is:
- \( a_n = 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, \ldots \).
However, please note that this does not reflect the entire recursion accurately as it begins from \( a_2 \). The true series starts with 6 and increases by 2 for further terms as shown.