Which sentence correctly uses ellipsis to show omission?(1 point)

He read that "it took more than two years for the case to be tried in court and a verdict to be reached..."
He read that "it took more than two years...for the case to be tried in court and a verdict to be reached."
He read that...."it took more than two years for the case to be tried in court and a verdict to be reached."
He read...that "it took more than two years for the case to be tried in court and a verdict to be reached."

3 answers

The correct sentence that uses ellipsis to show omission is:

He read that "it took more than two years...for the case to be tried in court and a verdict to be reached."

is this correct?

Yes, the sentence "He read that 'it took more than two years...for the case to be tried in court and a verdict to be reached.'" is correct in using ellipsis to indicate that some material has been omitted from the quoted text.

Ellipsis is properly placed in the middle of the quotation to indicate that there is a gap where additional text exists but is not being quoted.

If you have further questions or need more clarification, feel free to ask!

Similar Questions
  1. ellipses quick checkitem 1: when is an ellipsis used? to indicate a pause or an omission item 2: what does an omission indicate
    1. answers icon 11 answers
  2. Use the sentence to answer the prompt:He read that “it took more than two years . . . for the case to tried in court and a
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. use the sentence to answer the prompt.He read that "it took more than two years . . . for the case to tried in court and a
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions