Which sentence correctly explains the difference between sufficient and relevant evidence?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Sufficient evidence is enough facts and details to prove or support a claim, whereas relevant evidence directly relates to the ideas in the claim.
Sufficient evidence is enough facts and details to prove or support a claim, whereas relevant evidence directly relates to the ideas in the claim.

Sufficient evidence persuades an audience to believe the claim, whereas relevant evidence is based on researched facts and information.
Sufficient evidence persuades an audience to believe the claim, whereas relevant evidence is based on researched facts and information.

Sufficient evidence is a statement that presents opinions or a position on a topic, whereas relevant evidence is information that supports an argument’s claim.
Sufficient evidence is a statement that presents opinions or a position on a topic, whereas relevant evidence is information that supports an argument’s claim.

Sufficient evidence is information that supports an argument’s claim, whereas relevant evidence is enough facts and details to prove or support a claim.
Sufficient evidence is information that supports an argument’s claim, whereas relevant evidence is enough facts and details to prove or support a claim.
Skip to navigation

page 11 of 11

Answer 1

Sufficient evidence is enough facts and details to prove or support a claim, whereas relevant evidence directly relates to the ideas in the claim.