The sentence that most accurately evaluates how well the “What they found” section contributes to the author’s claims is: "The author’s claims are developed by explaining how an increase in plant diversity halts virus transmission among bees." This evaluation indicates that the findings directly support the author's overarching arguments.
Which sentence accurately evaluates how well the “What they found” section contributes to the author’s claims?(1 point)ResponsesThe author includes quotations from experts, but their claims are hypothetical and more research is required.The author includes quotations from experts, but their claims are hypothetical and more research is required.The author includes quotations from people who were not involved in the study, which detracts from the author’s claims because this information is not relevant.The author includes quotations from people who were not involved in the study, which detracts from the author’s claims because this information is not relevant.The author’s claims are developed by explaining how an increase in plant diversity halts virus transmission among bees.The author’s claims are developed by explaining how an increase in plant diversity halts virus transmission among bees.The author’s claims are well supported by examples of how farmers are improving bee management.
1 answer