To solve the equation \(2x = 125 - \frac{1}{2}x\), we can analyze both scenarios to determine which one fits the equation better:
-
Scenario 1: After two hours of driving at the same rate of miles per hour, the Garcia family is one-half hour short of reaching their vacation spot, which is 125 miles away.
In this case, let \(x\) represent the speed in miles per hour. The time they've already driven is 2 hours, and they are half an hour short, meaning they need a total of \(2.5\) hours for the trip. Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as:
\[ 2x = 125 - x \times \frac{1}{2} \] Rearranging gives us: \[ 2x = 125 - 0.5x \] This simplifies to \(2.5x = 125\), which does not match the original equation.
-
Scenario 2: A construction company has three barrels of cement. The two full barrels together weigh 125 pounds more than the third one, which is half full.
Let \(x\) be the weight of a full barrel of cement. Therefore, the weight of the two full barrels is \(2x\) and the weight of the half-full barrel is \(\frac{1}{2}x\). Thus, the equation representing this scenario is:
\[ 2x = \frac{1}{2}x + 125 \] Rearranging gives us: \[ 2x - \frac{1}{2}x = 125 \] Which simplifies to: \[ \frac{3}{2}x = 125 \] Again, this does not exactly match the original equation but incorporates the right elements.
To determine which scenario better models the equation \(2x = 125 - \frac{1}{2}x\) and fits neatly without contradictions, we can reanalyze:
Scenario 1 combines distance, time, and rate. Scenario 2 combines weight and operational constraints on the barrels.
The closest matching roots and transformations lead us back to Scenario 2, as it begins similarly with the comparison between weights. Thus:
Answer: 2.