Which scenario best illustrates how the power to make treaties in the United States Consituttion provides for checks and balances among the three branches of government?

Question

Responses

The Supreme Court must decide whether the treaty is constitutional, but Congress can override the court with approval of the president.
The Supreme Court must decide whether the treaty is constitutional, but Congress can override the court with approval of the president.

The president must sign an executive agreement without the Senate, but must have approval of the House and the Supreme Court.
The president must sign an executive agreement without the Senate, but must have approval of the House and the Supreme Court.

The House of Representatives must approve the treaty by a two-thirds vote, but it can be vetoed by the president or found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
The House of Representatives must approve the treaty by a two-thirds vote, but it can be vetoed by the president or found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

The Senate must approve a treaty by a two-thirds vote, and its terms must be found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court.

Answer 1

The scenario that best illustrates how the power to make treaties in the United States Constitution provides for checks and balances among the three branches of government is: The Senate must approve a treaty by a two-thirds vote, and its terms must be found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court. This scenario shows how the legislative and judicial branches can limit the power of the executive branch to make treaties. Additionally, the two-thirds vote requirement in the Senate provides a further check on the treaty-making power. And the requirement that the treaty's terms be found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court ensures that the treaty does not infringe upon individual rights or go beyond the scope of the federal government's powers.